Evaluating MOC Software? Prove the Fit Before You Commit. Explore Our MOC Proof of Concept →
Evaluating MOC Software? Prove the Fit Before You Commit. Explore Our MOC Proof of Concept →
Identify hazards, evaluate accident scenarios and maintain the structured safety argument demonstrating how nuclear safety risks are prevented, controlled and mitigated.
Connect hazards and consequences with safety claims, credited controls, supporting evidence and residual risk throughout the facility lifecycle.
Book a MeetingNuclear safety depends on understanding the hazards associated with a facility, the accident scenarios that can result and the controls relied upon to prevent or mitigate unacceptable consequences.
The challenge is maintaining the chain of reasoning between hazards, assumptions, analyses, safety claims, credited controls and supporting evidence. That information is often distributed across studies, calculations, reports and individual engineering disciplines.
As the design, operating configuration, regulatory basis and understanding of hazards evolve, the organization must be able to determine whether the assumptions and controls supporting the safety case remain valid.
Maintain a consistent record of hazards, initiating events, scenarios and potential consequences across the facility.
Trace accident scenarios to the preventive and mitigative controls relied upon by the safety analysis.
Document what is being claimed about safety and the basis on which that claim is supported.
Connect calculations, analyses, design information and verification evidence to the claims they support.
Document evaluated risk, acceptance decisions and the controls required to maintain acceptable conditions.
Identify when changes, events or new information may challenge assumptions or conclusions in the existing case.
A configurable lifecycle connects hazard identification and accident analysis with safety claims, credited controls, supporting evidence, approval and continuing maintenance of the safety case.
Configure hazard types, initiating events, scenarios, consequences and analysis attributes for your facility.
Structure safety claims, supporting arguments, assumptions and the evidence required to substantiate them.
Connect hazards and accident scenarios directly to credited controls and required safety functions.
Configure consequence, likelihood, risk-ranking and acceptance criteria appropriate to the safety program.
Associate calculations, analyses, verification records and other evidence with the claims they support.
Trigger review when changes, events, new hazards or updated requirements may affect existing conclusions.
FACILEX® ATOMIC connects hazards and safety conclusions with credited controls, design basis information, facility risk and the change processes capable of affecting those conclusions.
FACILEX® Hazard & Safety Case is one of 21 configurable applications within FACILEX® ATOMIC. Hazards and accident scenarios can remain connected to credited safety functions, design requirements, residual risks and configuration changes, helping the safety case remain aligned with the evolving facility.
We can map your hazard analyses, accident scenarios, safety claims, credited controls, supporting evidence and risk-acceptance criteria to a structured FACILEX® ATOMIC safety case.