Evaluating MOC Software? Prove the Fit Before You Commit. Explore Our MOC Proof of Concept →
Evaluating MOC Software? Prove the Fit Before You Commit. Explore Our MOC Proof of Concept →
Identify, evaluate and resolve conditions adverse to quality through a governed process that connects significance, cause determination, corrective action and effectiveness review.
Supports structured Corrective Action Programs aligned with nuclear quality assurance, problem identification and resolution, and continuous improvement requirements.
Book a MeetingNuclear organizations generate conditions, observations, deficiencies and improvement opportunities from operations, maintenance, engineering, audits, assessments and operating experience.
The challenge is determining which conditions are significant, what level of evaluation is required, why the condition occurred, and what corrective actions are proportionate to its safety, quality and regulatory significance.
Closing an action is not the same as correcting the problem. The program must preserve the basis for decisions and demonstrate that corrective actions were completed and, where required, were effective in preventing recurrence.
Create a consistent entry point for deficiencies, observations, concerns and improvement opportunities.
Apply screening and classification criteria so the level of evaluation and oversight matches the condition.
Route significant conditions through appropriate apparent, root or other cause evaluation before corrective action.
Assign ownership, due dates, approvals and escalation while maintaining traceability to the originating condition.
Preserve structured condition and cause information to support trending and identification of repeat or systemic problems.
Verify that significant corrective actions achieved their intended result before final program closure.
A configurable lifecycle maintains traceability from initial condition identification through significance determination, cause evaluation, corrective action and verified closure.
Configure categories, sources, classifications and required information to reflect your CAP structure.
Route conditions through different evaluation, approval and oversight paths according to significance.
Support configurable apparent-cause, root-cause and other evaluation methods appropriate to the condition.
Document whether similar conditions or causal factors may exist elsewhere in the organization.
Assign corrective actions, manage due dates and approvals, and escalate overdue or significant work.
Define effectiveness criteria, review dates and evidence requirements before final closure.
FACILEX® ATOMIC preserves the relationship between identified conditions and the audits, events, actions and operating experience that reveal or help resolve them.
FACILEX® Corrective Action Program is one of 21 configurable applications within FACILEX® ATOMIC. Conditions can originate from audits, events and operating experience; create accountable actions; reveal recurring trends; and become part of the evidence supporting quality assurance and regulatory oversight.
We can map your existing Corrective Action Program, significance criteria, cause evaluation methods, action controls and effectiveness reviews to a configured FACILEX® ATOMIC process.