Introducing psm.ai the definitive research library for Artificial Intelligence in Process Safety Management

Configuration Management at Scale: Lessons from a Leading Power Producer

Since 2015, one of America’s largest energy holding companies has relied on the Management of Change (MOC) process for asset change tracking. With a diverse fleet of more than 100 gas, coal, hydro, renewable, and district-energy facilities and thousands of active users, the utility needed a way to bring consistency, discipline, and safety to any asset changes across the enterprise.
Configuration Management at Scale

What the utility needed was a platform to enforce a lifecycle-based Management of Change process to control asset changes, large or small, while remaining flexible enough to accommodate diverse engineering practices across dozens of sites. FACILEX® became that platform.

Creating Consistency at Fleet Scale

In a large generation portfolio, configuration changes can affect drawings, procedures, setpoints, protective systems, training requirements, and vendor documentation. Historically, each site approached these changes differently, making it difficult to maintain:

  • A credible and accurate as-built record
  • Consistent procedural execution
  • Traceability of who initiated, reviewed, and approved each change
  • Confidence that downstream impacts were properly evaluated

FACILEX® addressed these challenges by establishing a common, lifecycle-based MOC process based on their approved procedures along with the ability to configure any site’s unique business process rules, forms, reports, etc. FACILEX® MOC supports change initiation, risk assessment, scoping, change design, impact analysis, approvals, implementation, PSSR’s, and completion of follow-up action items prior to close-out.

This lifecycle approach delivers consistency across dozens of facilities while preserving the flexibility needed to manage diverse engineering practices.

A Temporary Workspace for Managing Impacted Information

One of the most powerful capabilities deployed across the fleet was the creation of a temporary workspace for each configuration change.

This workspace:

  • Holds impacted documents, drawings, redlines, markups, and vendor packages
  • Captures discussions across engineering, operations, maintenance, and safety
  • Supports the procedural activities required by the lifecycle
  • Provides structured access for external service providers
  • Ensures only approved, final revisions flow back into the permanent system of record

Instead of uncontrolled email threads and file shares, every participant works from a single, authoritative location, with complete revision control and an audit trail.

This is the practical heart of configuration management: keeping all transient information organized and governed until the change is fully validated and closed.

Enabling Secure, Structured External Collaboration

Large utilities rely heavily on engineering firms, EPCs, OEMs, and specialist service providers. FACILEX® made this external collaboration safe and traceable by:

  • Providing secure, limited-scope access to the temporary workspace
  • Enforcing document states (WIP → Review → Approved → Archived)
  • Maintaining a full audit history of external contributions
  • Ensuring confidential or site-sensitive information remains protected

This allowed the utility to integrate contractors directly into the process, without sacrificing control or exposing the enterprise to unnecessary risk.

Credible As-Built Information: The Cornerstone of Safety

After ten years of operation across more than a hundred facilities, the most important lesson is simple: A controlled, robust configuration management process is essential to credible as-built information, and credible as-built information is essential for safety.

FACILEX® helped the utility achieve that by ensuring that:

  • Drawings reflect the plant as it truly exists
  • Procedures match the physical configuration
  • Protection logic, alarms, and interlocks are documented and reviewed
  • Operational risk is reduced by eliminating ambiguity
  • Engineers and operators trust the information in front of them

When personnel have confidence in their engineering data, they make better decisions.
Better decisions lead to safer, more reliable operations.

Driving Efficiency and Reducing Lifecycle Cost

Beyond safety, consistent configuration management has delivered measurable operational benefits:

  • Faster engineering reviews
  • Reduced rework caused by outdated information
  • Fewer documentation gaps during maintenance or troubleshooting
  • Streamlined turnover and commissioning
  • Improved readiness for regulatory audits
  • Simplified onboarding for new engineers and operators

At enterprise scale these gains compound and generate long-term strategic value.

Conclusion: Discipline at Scale Is Achievable

Managing configuration changes across a vast and diverse generation fleet is inherently complex.
But with the right digital foundation, it becomes a manageable, predictable process.

The experience of this major utility demonstrates that implementing MOC for configuration management:

  • Strengthens operational safety
  • Protects engineering data integrity
  • Reduces operational and maintenance risk
  • Enables secure contractor collaboration
  • Supports efficient, reliable plant operations

After a decade of real-world use, the message is clear: a robust configuration management process using FACILEX® MOC has produced great rewards.

Share:

More Posts

Using AI Agents to Navigate Fragmented Process Safety Systems

Most industrial organizations do not operate within a perfectly integrated Process Safety Management environment. Over time, facilities often accumulate numerous independent systems for inspections, Management of Change (MOC), Process Hazard Analyses (PHAs), incident investigations, mechanical integrity programs, engineering documentation, follow-up item management, and operational reporting.

The Hidden Costs of Fragmented Process Safety Management Platforms

Most organizations do not intentionally create fragmented Process Safety Management environments. In many cases, fragmentation develops gradually over time as facilities adopt separate tools to manage audits, inspections, incident investigations, Management of Change (MOC), mechanical integrity programs, Process Hazard Analyses (PHAs), follow-up items, and engineering documentation.

Closing-Out Follow-Up Action Items

Closing-Out Follow-Up Action Items

Most Process Safety Management programs are effective at identifying hazards, but risk is only reduced when follow-up action items are properly implemented, verified, and closed out. This article explores why disconnected tracking systems, overdue recommendations, and administrative close-outs can create hidden operational exposure, and how integrated platforms help organizations maintain visibility, accountability, and effective risk reduction across the full PSM lifecycle.

Effective Capital Project Management Requires More Than Scheduling

Major capital projects in refineries, chemical plants, LNG facilities, power generation, and other process industries are rarely managed as simple construction efforts. They are typically governed through structured capital project delivery methodologies such as Front-End Loading (FEL) and gated project approval processes designed to improve decision quality, control risk, and ensure operational readiness before startup.