AIChE Global Congress on Process Safety – Houston, TX April 12, 2026

The Role of Corrective Action Requests in Risk-Based Process Safety

Corrective Action Request (CAR) is more than just a compliance tool; it's a proactive mechanism for driving safety excellence. By integrating CARs into their Process Safety Management system, organizations can identify risks, implement corrective actions, and build a safer workplace. The FACILEX® Process Safety Suite provides a completely integrated solution for Corrective Actions Requests.

A “Complete Solution” for risk-based process safety management, as defined in the Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) guidelines incorporates four foundation blocks:

  1. Commit to Process Safety
  2. Understand Hazards and Risks
  3. Manage Risks
  4. Learn from Experience

These foundation blocks support the twenty pillars of Risk-Based Process Safety (RBPS).  The Corrective Action Request process is integral to several of the pillars of process safety.

What is a Corrective Action Request?

A Corrective Action Request (CAR) is a structured process for identifying, documenting, and resolving safety issues that arise from incidents, near misses, audits, inspections, and risk assessments. It ensures that problems are not just identified but also addressed in a systematic way, preventing recurrence and driving continuous improvement.

How the CAR Process Supports RBPS

The CAR process directly aligns with several key elements of Risk-Based Process Safety, including:

1. Incident Investigation

When an incident or near miss occurs, an investigation identifies the root cause. A CAR is then issued to track corrective actions that eliminate hazards and prevent recurrence. Without this follow-up, organizations risk repeating the same mistakes.

2. Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment

Risk assessments help uncover weaknesses in processes, equipment, or procedures. When a deficiency is identified, a CAR ensures that necessary safety improvements are documented, assigned, and completed.

3. Management of Change (MOC)

Whenever changes occur—such as modifications to equipment, processes, or personnel—new risks may emerge. The CAR process helps ensure that these risks are evaluated and mitigated before they lead to unsafe conditions.

4. Operating Procedures

Clear and up-to-date operating procedures are crucial for safe operations. When gaps or inconsistencies are found, CARs prompt revisions and improvements, ensuring that employees have accurate and reliable guidance.

5. Auditing and Performance Measurement

Routine audits often uncover noncompliance or weaknesses in safety practices. The CAR process ensures that findings are tracked, corrective actions are assigned, and improvements are verified—ensuring compliance with safety standards.

6. Continuous Improvement

Safety is not a one-time effort—it requires ongoing evaluation and enhancement. By systematically addressing issues through the CAR process, organizations create a culture of continuous improvement, reinforcing safety as a core value.

Final Thoughts

For a PSM-covered facility, small corrective actions today can prevent major incidents tomorrow. By making CARs a fundamental part of their safety culture,  organization can reduce risks, enhance compliance, and continuously improve process safety performance.

Share:

More Posts

Transforming Standards Development and Publishing

Transforming Standards Development and Publishing

Organizations that develop and publish engineering standards carry a unique responsibility. Their specifications guide design practices, manufacturing methods, construction quality, and operational safety across entire industries. Yet behind every published standard is an enormous effort: coordinating committees, managing revisions, validating technical data, and keeping documents consistent across a growing library.

Configuration Management at Scale

Configuration Management at Scale: Lessons from a Leading Power Producer

Since 2015, one of America’s largest energy holding companies has relied on the Management of Change (MOC) process for asset change tracking. With a diverse fleet of more than 100 gas, coal, hydro, renewable, and district-energy facilities and thousands of active users, the utility needed a way to bring consistency, discipline, and safety to any asset changes across the enterprise.

Why SharePoint Is the Smart Choice for PSI Management

Why SharePoint Is the Smart Choice for PSI Management

PSM-covered facilities rely on process safety information (PSI) to operate safely. Whether managing a Management of Change (MOC), conducting a Process Hazard Analysis (PHA), updating engineering specifications, or closing out a PSSR, success depends on one foundational capability: the ability to securely manage PSI across people, sites, and systems. That’s why FACILEX® is built on Microsoft SharePoint, the world’s most trusted Electronic Document Management (EDM) platform.

Why PSM is Especially Challenging for Smaller Facilities

Small Sites, Big Obligations: Why PSM is Especially Challenging for Smaller Facilities

When people picture a PSM-covered facility, they often imagine a massive refinery or chemical complex with thousands of employees and vast engineering departments. Yet across North America, many PSM-covered sites are small—sometimes only 50 to 200 people on site—and still must comply with the same OSHA 1910.119 requirements and industry best practices that apply to the world’s largest enterprises.