The Role of Corrective Action Requests in Risk-Based Process Safety

Corrective Action Request (CAR) is more than just a compliance tool; it's a proactive mechanism for driving safety excellence. By integrating CARs into their Process Safety Management system, organizations can identify risks, implement corrective actions, and build a safer workplace. The FACILEX® Process Safety Suite provides a completely integrated solution for Corrective Actions Requests.

A “Complete Solution” for risk-based process safety management, as defined in the Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) guidelines incorporates four foundation blocks:

  1. Commit to Process Safety
  2. Understand Hazards and Risks
  3. Manage Risks
  4. Learn from Experience

These foundation blocks support the twenty pillars of Risk-Based Process Safety (RBPS).  The Corrective Action Request process is integral to several of the pillars of process safety.

What is a Corrective Action Request?

A Corrective Action Request (CAR) is a structured process for identifying, documenting, and resolving safety issues that arise from incidents, near misses, audits, inspections, and risk assessments. It ensures that problems are not just identified but also addressed in a systematic way, preventing recurrence and driving continuous improvement.

How the CAR Process Supports RBPS

The CAR process directly aligns with several key elements of Risk-Based Process Safety, including:

1. Incident Investigation

When an incident or near miss occurs, an investigation identifies the root cause. A CAR is then issued to track corrective actions that eliminate hazards and prevent recurrence. Without this follow-up, organizations risk repeating the same mistakes.

2. Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment

Risk assessments help uncover weaknesses in processes, equipment, or procedures. When a deficiency is identified, a CAR ensures that necessary safety improvements are documented, assigned, and completed.

3. Management of Change (MOC)

Whenever changes occur—such as modifications to equipment, processes, or personnel—new risks may emerge. The CAR process helps ensure that these risks are evaluated and mitigated before they lead to unsafe conditions.

4. Operating Procedures

Clear and up-to-date operating procedures are crucial for safe operations. When gaps or inconsistencies are found, CARs prompt revisions and improvements, ensuring that employees have accurate and reliable guidance.

5. Auditing and Performance Measurement

Routine audits often uncover noncompliance or weaknesses in safety practices. The CAR process ensures that findings are tracked, corrective actions are assigned, and improvements are verified—ensuring compliance with safety standards.

6. Continuous Improvement

Safety is not a one-time effort—it requires ongoing evaluation and enhancement. By systematically addressing issues through the CAR process, organizations create a culture of continuous improvement, reinforcing safety as a core value.

Final Thoughts

For a PSM-covered facility, small corrective actions today can prevent major incidents tomorrow. By making CARs a fundamental part of their safety culture,  organization can reduce risks, enhance compliance, and continuously improve process safety performance.

Share:

More Posts

Leading Utilities Are Embracing Process Safety Management

Municipal water and wastewater utilities are foundational to public health and environmental protection. As these facilities modernize—incorporating new energy systems, automation, and advanced chemical processes—the complexity of operations continues to grow. With this complexity comes a renewed focus on the principles of Process Safety Management (PSM): identifying, assessing, and controlling the risks inherent in high-energy or hazardous systems. By adopting the Management of Change (MOC) process, the municipal sector reflects a culture of professional responsibility to its employees and the community.

Powering the Future Safely: Introducing Process Safety Management to Hydrogen Operations

Hydrogen fuel cells are rapidly transitioning from pilot projects to large-scale deployments in warehouses, logistics hubs, data centers, industrial sites, and beyond. While these systems offer a cleaner, more reliable energy pathway, they also introduce new risks for sectors that have not historically applied process safety practices. Process Safety Management (PSM) provides the framework to manage hydrogen’s unique risks, ensuring operations remain safe, reliable, and scalable.

From Paper to Digital: Transitioning to Electronic Operator Logs in PSM-Covered Facilities

Process Safety Management (PSM) facilities operate in environments where precision, accountability, and real-time visibility are non-negotiable. Among the most critical—but often overlooked—tools for safe operations are operator logs. Traditionally maintained on paper or rudimentary spreadsheets, operator logs are a backbone of shift handovers, deviation tracking, equipment status reporting, and process continuity.

Bridging Legacy HSE Systems with the Latest Process Safety Platforms

Implementing a modern Risk-Based Process Safety (RBPS) platform is rarely a clean break from old systems to new. More often, organizations must operate a mix of legacy applications and newer solutions, each holding essential safety and operational data. This dual environment creates complexity in reporting Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s).
FACILEX® CONNECT delivers holistic KPI dashboards in Power BI without the cost and risk of tight integrations, ensuring continuity and compliance during system transitions.