Introducing psm.ai the definitive research library for Artificial Intelligence in Process Safety Management

Hidden Dependencies in PSM: Lessons from the Helium Supply Disruption

Recent geopolitical instability, including conflict involving Iran, has exposed a structural vulnerability in global helium supply. While helium is often treated as a niche industrial gas, its role in high-hazard operations is disproportionately critical. For many facilities, helium underpins inerting, purging, leak detection, and analytical systems that are foundational to safe operation. As supply tightens, the issue is not simply cost or availability. It is the introduction of unmanaged process safety risk into systems that were designed with stable helium supply as an implicit assumption.
Lessons from the Helium Supply Disruption

The Role of Helium in Process Safety Systems

Helium is uniquely valued in process industries due to its physical and chemical properties:

  • Chemically inert and non-flammable
  • Extremely low density and high diffusivity
  • Superior performance in leak detection applications
  • Minimal impact on process chemistry

These characteristics make helium particularly effective for:

  • Precision leak detection in high-integrity systems
  • Specialized purging and inerting applications
  • Carrier gas in analytical instrumentation

In many cases, helium is not just a utility. It is embedded in safety-critical design assumptions.

When Supply Constraints Become Safety Risks

Under normal conditions, helium availability is rarely questioned. However, supply disruptions force operational and engineering decisions that can erode safety margins.

1. Degradation of Inerting Effectiveness

Helium is sometimes used in niche inerting scenarios where rapid diffusion or low density is required. When supply is constrained, facilities may:

  • Reduce purge volumes
  • Extend purge intervals
  • Operate closer to limiting oxygen concentrations

Each of these actions increases the probability of flammable atmospheres forming, particularly in transient or startup conditions.

2. Substitution Without Full Hazard Evaluation

A common response to helium shortages is substitution with nitrogen or argon. While both are inert, they are not equivalent.

  • Nitrogen has higher density and different dispersion characteristics
  • Argon can accumulate in low-lying areas, increasing asphyxiation risk
  • Substitution may alter pressure profiles, mixing behavior, and purge efficiency

Treating these gases as interchangeable can introduce new hazards that are not captured in existing PHAs.

This is a classic trigger for breakdown in Management of Change (MOC) discipline, where urgency overrides structured risk evaluation.

3. Reduced Leak Detection Sensitivity

Helium is the gold standard for leak detection due to its small atomic size and detectability. Substituting alternative methods or reducing testing frequency can result in:

  • Undetected micro-leaks in critical systems
  • Increased fugitive emissions
  • Latent integrity failures that escalate over time

This directly impacts mechanical integrity programs, which rely on early detection of degradation.

4. Operational Workarounds and Temporary Practices

Supply shortages often lead to informal or temporary adjustments, including:

  • Deferred maintenance or testing
  • Reuse of gas beyond recommended purity thresholds
  • Manual workarounds outside standard procedures

These actions introduce human and organizational risk factors, particularly when they are not formally documented or reviewed.

Why New Supply Is Not a Near-Term Solution

It is tempting to assume that supply shortages will drive rapid investment in new helium production facilities. In reality:

  • Helium is typically recovered as a byproduct of natural gas processing
  • New production requires significant capital investment and long lead times
  • Infrastructure constraints limit rapid scaling

The more immediate response across industry is likely to be:

  • Increased helium recovery and recycling systems
  • Optimization of existing consumption
  • Selective substitution in non-critical applications

Each of these introduces new process configurations that must be evaluated through a process safety lens.

Emerging Risk: Helium Recovery and Recycling Systems

As organizations invest in helium conservation, new systems are introduced into existing facilities:

  • Compression and storage systems
  • Cryogenic separation and purification units
  • Additional piping, controls, and interfaces

These systems introduce:

  • New pressure and temperature hazards
  • Additional failure modes
  • Increased system complexity

Without proper integration into existing PSM programs, these upgrades can shift risk rather than reduce it.

Reframing Helium as a Critical Utility

The current shortage highlights a broader issue. Helium is part of a class of “hidden critical utilities” that are often underrepresented in process safety programs.

For PSM-covered operations, this event reinforces the need to:

  • Explicitly identify critical utilities within hazard analyses
  • Evaluate dependency risks as part of Process Hazard Analysis (PHA)
  • Incorporate supply disruption scenarios into contingency planning
  • Strengthen governance around temporary operating conditions

This aligns with the intent of Center for Chemical Process Safety Risk-Based Process Safety principles, particularly around operational discipline and risk awareness.

Practical Actions for PSM Professionals

Organizations should take a structured approach to managing helium-related risk:

1. Initiate Targeted Reviews

  • Identify systems where helium is safety-critical
  • Validate design assumptions related to inerting and leak detection

2. Enforce Rigorous MOC for Substitution

  • Require formal hazard evaluation for any gas substitution
  • Update procedures, training, and documentation accordingly

3. Reassess Leak Detection Programs

  • Evaluate impact of reduced helium availability on inspection effectiveness
  • Consider risk-based prioritization of critical systems

4. Integrate Supply Risk into PSM

  • Treat helium availability as a risk input, not just a procurement issue
  • Develop contingency plans for constrained supply scenarios

5. Evaluate Recovery Systems Through a PSM Lens

  • Ensure new systems are fully captured in PHA, MOC, and Mechanical Integrity programs
  • Avoid treating conservation projects as low-risk modifications

Conclusion

Helium shortages are not just a supply chain issue. They are a process safety issue that can quietly undermine the integrity of inerting, leak detection, and analytical systems.

For high-hazard operations, the risk is not in the absence of helium itself. It is in the unexamined changes that occur in response to that absence – changes that should be formally evaluated through a process hazard analysis.

Organizations that recognize helium as a critical safety utility, and manage it accordingly within their PSM framework, will be far better positioned to maintain safe and reliable operations under constrained conditions.

Share:

More Posts

A Real-World Test of Generative AI in Process Safety

Replacement-in-Kind vs. Management of Change

Determining whether a change is Replacement-in-Kind (RIK) or requires Management of Change (MOC) is a critical process safety decision. This post explores whether Generative AI can help make that call more consistently and reliably.

Migrating to Microsoft Azure Government Cloud

Migrating to Microsoft Azure Government Cloud

As organizations in safety-critical and regulated industries modernize their digital infrastructure, cloud platform selection has become a matter of governance, risk, and compliance, not just IT. The migration of operational systems to Microsoft Azure Government reflects a deliberate move toward an environment engineered to meet the highest standards of security, data control, and operational resilience.

For organizations managing Process Safety Management (PSM) programs, this transition provides measurable improvements in both cybersecurity posture and system reliability, directly supporting safer and more consistent operations.

psm.ai

A Home for Research on Artificial Intelligence in Process Safety

PSM.ai is a curated knowledge platform dedicated to the application of artificial intelligence in process safety. It brings together peer-reviewed research, technical papers, and emerging industry perspectives into a structured, vendor-neutral resource aligned with Risk-Based Process Safety (RBPS) principles.