AIChE Global Congress on Process Safety – Houston, TX April 12, 2026

Choosing the Right Capital Project Lifecycle

Choosing the appropriate lifecycle for a capital project is a critical success factor for managing large or small projects effectively. The FACILEX® Capital Projects solution supports multiple lifecycle options to meet an organizations's procedural requirements.
Choosing the Right Capital Project Lifecycle

The Front-End Loading (FEL) process is a structured project management approach used in large capital projects to systematically develop project scope, budget, and schedule with increasing levels of detail. Divided into distinct phases—FEL 1 (Conceptual Design), FEL 2 (Preliminary Engineering), and FEL 3 (Detailed Design)—each stage builds on the last, progressively refining project plans, risk assessments, cost estimates, and design specifics. At the end of each FEL phase, a gate review is conducted to evaluate project readiness and decide whether to proceed to the next phase, adjust the project scope, or halt the project. The FEL process aims to ensure that all aspects of the project are well-defined and understood before major resources are committed, reducing the likelihood of costly changes or delays later in the project and increasing the overall likelihood of success.

For smaller capital projects, alternative project lifecycles that are often more efficient and tailored to limited scope include:

1. Stage-Gate Process: This simplified life cycle involves a series of distinct stages, such as concept, planning, execution, and close-out, with reviews or “gates” between each stage to assess progress and decide on project continuation. This process provides structured checkpoints, suitable for smaller projects that still require some oversight.

2. Agile Project Management: Agile methods, though commonly associated with software development, can be adapted for smaller capital projects where requirements or designs may evolve as the project progresses. Agile focuses on iterative work cycles, allowing teams to deliver smaller, incremental results and adapt to changes effectively.

3. Lean Project Management: Lean methodologies emphasize maximizing value and reducing waste. This approach is well-suited for projects with straightforward objectives where efficiency is key, focusing on minimizing unnecessary steps, enhancing process flow, and achieving cost and time savings.

4. Design-Build: For smaller construction-focused capital projects, the Design-Build approach integrates design and construction phases, often resulting in faster project delivery. With a single entity responsible for both phases, it simplifies coordination and can reduce the risk of miscommunication and delays.

5. Waterfall Approach: The waterfall method is linear and sequential, moving through defined phases—such as initiation, planning, execution, and closure—without much iteration. This approach works well for smaller projects with clear, well-defined goals and minimal expected changes.

Each of these alternative lifecycles provides flexibility to manage smaller projects effectively without the more complex requirements of a full FEL (Front-End Loading) process, making them suitable for projects with constrained resources or shorter timelines.

Please contact Gateway to schedule a demo of the Capital Project Management solution.

Share:

More Posts

Transforming Standards Development and Publishing

Transforming Standards Development and Publishing

Organizations that develop and publish engineering standards carry a unique responsibility. Their specifications guide design practices, manufacturing methods, construction quality, and operational safety across entire industries. Yet behind every published standard is an enormous effort: coordinating committees, managing revisions, validating technical data, and keeping documents consistent across a growing library.

Configuration Management at Scale

Configuration Management at Scale: Lessons from a Leading Power Producer

Since 2015, one of America’s largest energy holding companies has relied on the Management of Change (MOC) process for asset change tracking. With a diverse fleet of more than 100 gas, coal, hydro, renewable, and district-energy facilities and thousands of active users, the utility needed a way to bring consistency, discipline, and safety to any asset changes across the enterprise.

Why SharePoint Is the Smart Choice for PSI Management

Why SharePoint Is the Smart Choice for PSI Management

PSM-covered facilities rely on process safety information (PSI) to operate safely. Whether managing a Management of Change (MOC), conducting a Process Hazard Analysis (PHA), updating engineering specifications, or closing out a PSSR, success depends on one foundational capability: the ability to securely manage PSI across people, sites, and systems. That’s why FACILEX® is built on Microsoft SharePoint, the world’s most trusted Electronic Document Management (EDM) platform.

Why PSM is Especially Challenging for Smaller Facilities

Small Sites, Big Obligations: Why PSM is Especially Challenging for Smaller Facilities

When people picture a PSM-covered facility, they often imagine a massive refinery or chemical complex with thousands of employees and vast engineering departments. Yet across North America, many PSM-covered sites are small—sometimes only 50 to 200 people on site—and still must comply with the same OSHA 1910.119 requirements and industry best practices that apply to the world’s largest enterprises.