When Should MOCs be Initiated During a Capital Project?

Retroactive MOC creation - attempting to convert completed work orders into MOCs - bypasses critical safety evaluations, approvals, and documentation, compromising both safety and compliance. The FACILEX PSM suite provides fully integrated solutions for Capital Projects and Management of Change (MOC) for seamless process management and regulatory compliance.
When Should MOCs be Initiated During a Capital Project?

The Management of Change (MOC) process is a proactive safety measure designed to evaluate and control risks before changes are implemented. In the context of capital projects, initiating MOCs at the planning stage is crucial to ensuring safety, compliance, and robust document management. 

Why MOC Should Be Proactive

The purpose of an MOC project is to assess and manage risks before a change is made. This proactive approach provides several key benefits:

  • Risk Mitigation: Identifies and addresses potential hazards of the process
  • Regulatory Compliance: PSM covered processes and highly-regulated facilities
  • Supporting Documentation: Captures the rationale, evaluations, and approvals 

Retroactive MOC creation—attempting to convert completed work orders into MOCs—bypasses critical safety evaluations, approvals, and documentation, compromising both safety and compliance.

Risks of Delayed or Retroactive MOC Initiation

  1. Missed Safety Evaluations
    By avoiding the MOC process, hazards introduced by changes may go unidentified, increasing the likelihood of incidents
  2. Incomplete Documentation
    Retroactive MOC creation often leads to gaps in the process, such as missing technical assessments, risk evaluations, or approvals
  3. Confusion About Rationale
    Delaying MOC initiation can result in misunderstandings among team members about why the change was made or who was responsible for implementing it
  4. Outdated Process Safety Information (PSI)
    By avoiding the MOC process, necessary updates to the PSI may be delayed or forgotten resulting in misunderstandings about the current configuration of the facility

    Best Practices for MOC Timing in Capital Projects

To maximize safety and compliance, MOC should be initiated early in the capital project lifecycle:

  1. Identify Changes Requiring MOC
    During the planning phase, evaluate all proposed changes to determine if they require MOCs
  2. Integrate MOC with Project Workflows
    Ensure that MOC procedures are embedded in the project management process, with work orders and tasks executed in alignment with approved MOC steps
  3. Conduct Risk Assessments Before Implementation
    Use MOC to evaluate risks, define controls, and secure approvals before any physical changes are made.
  4. Maintain Thorough Records
    Document every step of the MOC process, including technical evaluations, approvals, and revisions to the facility’s PSI.

Conclusion

During a capital project, MOCs should be initiated for any proposed change to a PSM covered process. MOCs ensure that risks are assessed and controlled before implementation, preserving safety, regulatory compliance, and process integrity. By embedding MOCs into the capital project lifecycle, organizations reduce risk to their workers, the facility and the environment.  Contact Gateway to learn more about improving efficiency and safety in capital projects.

Share:

More Posts

Leading Utilities Are Embracing Process Safety Management

Municipal water and wastewater utilities are foundational to public health and environmental protection. As these facilities modernize—incorporating new energy systems, automation, and advanced chemical processes—the complexity of operations continues to grow. With this complexity comes a renewed focus on the principles of Process Safety Management (PSM): identifying, assessing, and controlling the risks inherent in high-energy or hazardous systems. By adopting the Management of Change (MOC) process, the municipal sector reflects a culture of professional responsibility to its employees and the community.

Powering the Future Safely: Introducing Process Safety Management to Hydrogen Operations

Hydrogen fuel cells are rapidly transitioning from pilot projects to large-scale deployments in warehouses, logistics hubs, data centers, industrial sites, and beyond. While these systems offer a cleaner, more reliable energy pathway, they also introduce new risks for sectors that have not historically applied process safety practices. Process Safety Management (PSM) provides the framework to manage hydrogen’s unique risks, ensuring operations remain safe, reliable, and scalable.

From Paper to Digital: Transitioning to Electronic Operator Logs in PSM-Covered Facilities

Process Safety Management (PSM) facilities operate in environments where precision, accountability, and real-time visibility are non-negotiable. Among the most critical—but often overlooked—tools for safe operations are operator logs. Traditionally maintained on paper or rudimentary spreadsheets, operator logs are a backbone of shift handovers, deviation tracking, equipment status reporting, and process continuity.

Bridging Legacy HSE Systems with the Latest Process Safety Platforms

Implementing a modern Risk-Based Process Safety (RBPS) platform is rarely a clean break from old systems to new. More often, organizations must operate a mix of legacy applications and newer solutions, each holding essential safety and operational data. This dual environment creates complexity in reporting Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s).
FACILEX® CONNECT delivers holistic KPI dashboards in Power BI without the cost and risk of tight integrations, ensuring continuity and compliance during system transitions.