Why Organizational Change Belongs in Your Management of Change Program

Experience has shown that personnel changes can be just as consequential as process changes. When staffing levels shift, roles are reassigned, or technical expertise is reduced, the controls that keep operations safe can weaken. Transitions—whether through retirements, restructures, or onboarding—can quietly erode the institutional knowledge that underpins safe operations.

The OSHA Process Safety Management (PSM) regulation, 29 CFR 1910.119, is explicit in its intent to prevent catastrophic chemical releases. However, it does not clearly address how organizations should manage organizational changes—such as those involving personnel, reporting structures, or resource allocation. Section 1910.119(l) limits the Management of Change (MOC) requirement to changes in process chemicals, technology, equipment, procedures, and facilities that affect a covered process, leaving many organizations to rely on management of change solutions and applications to consistently capture, evaluate, and govern organizational impacts that fall outside the strict regulatory definition.

The CCPS Perspective

The Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) has long recognized this gap. In its publication Guidelines for Managing Process Safety Risks During Organizational Change (2013), CCPS introduced the concept of Organizational Management of Change (OMOC) as a complementary discipline to technical MOC. The key message is simple: changes in people, structure, or responsibilities must be managed with the same rigor as physical or procedural modifications.

A well-defined OMOC process ensures that:
• Safety-critical roles remain filled and competent.
• Workload and supervision changes are assessed for risk.
• Training and handover requirements are completed before changes take effect.
• Documentation, access, and communication pathways remain intact.

Integrating organizational change into the MOC lifecycle transforms it from a compliance exercise into a holistic process safety management system—one that fully reflects the realities of modern, dynamic organizations.

Scoping the Change: The Foundation of an Effective OMOC

One of the most important and frequently overlooked steps in Organizational MOC (OMOC) is scoping the change—clearly defining what is changing, who is affected, and how risk should be evaluated.

FACILEX® provides three standard OMOC lifecycles, each designed for the type of organizational change being managed:
1. Organizational Structure Change – covering departmental realignments, reporting line adjustments, or the creation or removal of groups or functions.
2. Personnel Change – covering onboarding, transfers, terminations, retirements, or succession transitions.
3. Position Change – addressing role reassignments, promotions, or changes to responsibilities or authority levels.

Each lifecycle includes a comprehensive library of general and specific scoping checklists, aligned with CCPS guidelines, ensuring that all relevant considerations are identified before the change proceeds.

FACILEX® also includes a baseline OMOC Risk Matrix, which can be used immediately or replaced to incorporate the organization’s preferred risk matrix—ensuring alignment with existing corporate methodologies.

Document Security: A Critical Component of OMOC

Organizational changes often involve highly sensitive information. Promotions, hiring, onboarding, and retirements introduce continuous movement of confidential materials—resumes, performance reviews, competency assessments, and succession planning documents. These must be tightly controlled to protect privacy and maintain trust.

FACILEX® addresses this challenge through advanced document-level security configuration. Access permissions automatically align with role assignments and group memberships, ensuring that:
• Users can only view documents relevant to their responsibilities.
• Sensitive materials are isolated within secure SharePoint containers with complete audit trails.
• Confidential documents remain entirely invisible to unauthorized users—if you are not authorized to see it, you won’t even know it exists.

This zero-visibility model allows OMOC lifecycles to manage sensitive HR and organizational data within the same environment that governs process safety and engineering change—without compromising integrity or confidentiality.

Integration with HR Platforms: Connecting the Human Element

Because OMOC is always about people, not assets, integration with human resource systems is essential.

FACILEX® supports seamless connectivity through FACILEX CONNECT, enabling organizations to:
• Exchange personnel and position information securely with HR platforms such as SAP SuccessFactors®, Oracle® HCM, or Workday®.
• Automate population of change forms and reviewer assignments based on HR data.
• Store or retrieve confidential records in designated HR repositories while maintaining traceability in FACILEX®.

This integration ensures that organizational changes are synchronized with HR systems—reducing duplication, preserving confidentiality, and ensuring that every step of the change process is properly authorized and auditable.

FACILEX®: Turning CCPS Guidance into Operational Practice

FACILEX® transforms CCPS best practices into an integrated, auditable, and targeted lifecycles for managing both technical and organizational change. It enables companies to:
• Select from three standard OMOC lifecycles—Organizational Structure Change, Personnel Change, and Position Change.
• Apply CCPS-aligned scoping checklists and configurable OMOC risk matrices.
• Protect sensitive documents with zero-visibility security.
• Integrate seamlessly with enterprise HR systems through FACILEX CONNECT.
• Maintain full traceability and auditability throughout every stage of the change.

FACILEX® makes Organizational MOC practical, disciplined, and secure—bridging the gap between compliance and operational excellence.

Closing Thought

Regulations define the minimum. CCPS defines the standard of care. By extending Management of Change to include organizational and personnel changes, companies strengthen not only compliance but also continuity, culture, and control.

With FACILEX®, that standard is embedded in each MOC lifecycle—integrating technical and human change management under one intelligent, risk-based, and secure framework.

Share:

More Posts

Workflow Is Not a Strategy: Why Management of Change Must Be Designed as a Lifecycle

Over the past two decades, many organizations have invested heavily in digital Management of Change (MOC) systems. Most of these systems share a common design philosophy: they treat MOC as a workflow—a predefined sequence of steps that moves a change request from initiation to approval and closure.
This approach is appealing to IT teams because workflows are easy to automate, measure, and control. However, it fundamentally misrepresents the nature of Management of Change.
MOC is not a linear process. It is a lifecycle-based business process that must adapt to technical complexity, organizational context, and evolving risk. When organizations attempt to force MOC into rigid workflow structures, they inadvertently create systems that are efficient in appearance but ineffective in practice.
To support modern process safety, MOC must be architected as a configurable lifecycle embedded within an integrated risk-based process safety framework—not as a static workflow engine.

Why Management of Change Must Be Rebuilt for Modern Industry

Management of Change (MOC) is one of the most critical controls in process safety management, yet it remains one of the most misunderstood. While regulatory frameworks such as OSHA 1910.119 define what must be addressed, they do not define how organizations should design, execute, and govern change in complex industrial environments.
Most MOC systems in use today were not designed for the realities of modern operations. They evolved from paper-based processes and early digital document management tools that prioritized compliance over risk intelligence, traceability, and integration.
To meet the demands of contemporary industrial operations, MOC must be fundamentally rethought—not as a form, a workflow, or a compliance exercise, but as a lifecycle-based business process embedded within an integrated process safety ecosystem.

AI Governance Starts Long Before AI Is Introduced

Artificial intelligence governance is often discussed as a new discipline—one that emerges only after AI tools are deployed. Policies are drafted, oversight committees formed, and ethical frameworks debated. While these steps are important, they miss a critical reality:
AI governance does not begin with AI. It begins with how information has been governed for years.

Automation Before AI: Lessons from Asset-Intensive Industries

As artificial intelligence gains momentum across industries, many organizations are eager to move directly from manual work to AI-enabled solutions. In asset-intensive and regulated environments, this leap often ends in frustration. The issue is not ambition, it is sequencing.
Organizations that succeed with AI consistently share one characteristic: they automated their information and business processes before attempting to make them intelligent. Those that skip this step discover that AI struggles to add value on top of fragmented, inconsistent, or poorly defined processes.