Transforming Standards Development and Publishing

Organizations that develop and publish engineering standards carry a unique responsibility. Their specifications guide design practices, manufacturing methods, construction quality, and operational safety across entire industries. Yet behind every published standard is an enormous effort: coordinating committees, managing revisions, validating technical data, and keeping documents consistent across a growing library.
Transforming Standards Development and Publishing

For many standards bodies, these processes still depend on manual assembly and aging document repositories leading to inconsistency, slow revision cycles, and unnecessary administrative burden.

FACILEX® changes that paradigm by delivering a fully integrated environment for standards creation, review, approval, publication, and long-term lifecycle management. 

Governance, Control and Collaboration

Initially standards development demands a modern platform that manages the full lifecycle of developing new specifications. FACILEX® offers an end-to-end governance framework that aligns perfectly with the requirements of a committee-driven process.

1. Initiation of New Standards

  • Configurable request and scoping workflows
  • Structured templates for defining purpose, scope, and requirements
  • Automatic routing to the correct committees and subject matter experts

2. Development and Collaboration

  • Version-controlled workspaces
  • Integrated conversation threads and technical submittal tracking
  • Ability to attach supporting calculations, historical references, and legacy specifications

3. Review and Approval

  • Multi-stage committee reviews mapped to client’s governance model
  • Automated notifications, task assignments, and progress tracking
  • Full audit history of changes, reviewers, and decisions

SharePoint: The EDM Vault for Draft and Final Specifications

One of the most powerful features of the FACILEX® Standards & Practices solution is its SharePoint platform, as the secure, authoritative Electronic Document Management (EDM) vault.  SharePoint provides the most advanced commercial EDM capabilities available today:

A Secure, Structured Repository

  • Enterprise-grade permissions
  • Controlled access for committees, editors, and external collaborators
  • Full version history and recordkeeping for compliance

Work-In-Progress (WIP) Document Control

  • Draft specifications stored in a controlled environment
  • Roles-based visibility (e.g., “committee only” views)
  • Lifecycle state management: Draft → Review → Approved → Published

Final Specification Vault

  • Published documents stored with strict read-only governance
  • Automated metadata classification for indexing and retrieval
  • Native support for long-term retention and archival policies

Integrated with the FACILEX® Data Model

FACILEX® links every draft and published document directly to its:

  • lifecycle
  • technical data
  • related specifications
  • revision history
  • SQL data sources (where applicable)

The SharePoint platform delivers a context-rich knowledge repository, where every specification can be explored by relationships, history, and underlying data.

The Evolution: SQL-Driven Automated Specification Publishing

In addition to governance and lifecycle-based process management, FACILEX® unlocks something even more powerful: the ability to auto-generate full specifications from structured SQL datasets.

What once required hours of specialized document assembly—collecting tables, dimensions, materials, notes, and formatting can now be generated in minutes with perfect consistency.

Key Advantages

  • Single source of truth: All data resides in a governed SQL database.
  • Instant regeneration: Any data update can generate a new spec in seconds.
  • Template-driven formatting: Uniform style across every standard or specification.
  • Zero manual assembly: Eliminates human error and formatting drift.
  • Audit-ready: Committee-approved data flows directly into the published PDF.

Integrated .pdf document generation drives consistency, eliminates errors, and strengthens the quality and value of content in the library.

The Power of Integrated Reporting

Because FACILEX® captures every data element, document, and workflow interaction, it offers powerful reporting insights:

  • Which specs reference each dataset
  • Where a change will have downstream impact
  • Committee productivity and review timelines
  • Version comparisons and historical traceability
  • Metrics on usage, publication frequency, and aging documents

This connectivity transforms standards management from document tracking into a data-driven governance model.

Why Choose FACILEX®

Organizations that produce technical standards face common challenges:

  • Lengthy review cycles
  • Manual document preparation
  • Disconnected document repositories
  • Fragmented datasets
  • Growing demand for digital-ready content

FACILEX® offers an integrated, proven solution that addresses all of these through:

1. Lifecycle-based specification development

2. SharePoint-driven document governance

3. SQL-backed automated publishing

4. Rich metadata and reporting analytics

5. Centralized control of structured technical data

This is the future of standards publishing: a unified, data-centric, automated environment where governance, collaboration, and document control converge.

Conclusion

FACILEX® embodies what’s possible when modern digital tools are applied to standards development. What began as a platform for managing the creation and approval of specifications has grown into a fully integrated ecosystem, combining SharePoint’s enterprise EDM capabilities with a FACILEX® governance model and SQL-driven publishing engine.

The result is a faster, more accurate, and more consistent standards program that meets the expectations of today’s engineering community.

Standards organizations seeking to modernize their workflows, reduce administrative burden, and deliver higher-quality publications now have a clear, proven path forward.

Share:

More Posts

Workflow Is Not a Strategy: Why Management of Change Must Be Designed as a Lifecycle

Over the past two decades, many organizations have invested heavily in digital Management of Change (MOC) systems. Most of these systems share a common design philosophy: they treat MOC as a workflow—a predefined sequence of steps that moves a change request from initiation to approval and closure.
This approach is appealing to IT teams because workflows are easy to automate, measure, and control. However, it fundamentally misrepresents the nature of Management of Change.
MOC is not a linear process. It is a lifecycle-based business process that must adapt to technical complexity, organizational context, and evolving risk. When organizations attempt to force MOC into rigid workflow structures, they inadvertently create systems that are efficient in appearance but ineffective in practice.
To support modern process safety, MOC must be architected as a configurable lifecycle embedded within an integrated risk-based process safety framework—not as a static workflow engine.

Why Management of Change Must Be Rebuilt for Modern Industry

Management of Change (MOC) is one of the most critical controls in process safety management, yet it remains one of the most misunderstood. While regulatory frameworks such as OSHA 1910.119 define what must be addressed, they do not define how organizations should design, execute, and govern change in complex industrial environments.
Most MOC systems in use today were not designed for the realities of modern operations. They evolved from paper-based processes and early digital document management tools that prioritized compliance over risk intelligence, traceability, and integration.
To meet the demands of contemporary industrial operations, MOC must be fundamentally rethought—not as a form, a workflow, or a compliance exercise, but as a lifecycle-based business process embedded within an integrated process safety ecosystem.

AI Governance Starts Long Before AI Is Introduced

Artificial intelligence governance is often discussed as a new discipline—one that emerges only after AI tools are deployed. Policies are drafted, oversight committees formed, and ethical frameworks debated. While these steps are important, they miss a critical reality:
AI governance does not begin with AI. It begins with how information has been governed for years.

Automation Before AI: Lessons from Asset-Intensive Industries

As artificial intelligence gains momentum across industries, many organizations are eager to move directly from manual work to AI-enabled solutions. In asset-intensive and regulated environments, this leap often ends in frustration. The issue is not ambition, it is sequencing.
Organizations that succeed with AI consistently share one characteristic: they automated their information and business processes before attempting to make them intelligent. Those that skip this step discover that AI struggles to add value on top of fragmented, inconsistent, or poorly defined processes.