Schedule Demo
  • 716-636-0200
Schedule Demo

Dr. Rainer Hoff at AIChE GCPS 2026 — Chairing “Generative AI for Hazard Analysis” | Apr 12–16, Houston | Details →

Harnessing a Data Mart for Seamless Data Exchange

By incorporating a Data Mart into your data sync strategy, you can enhance data exchange efficiency, ensure consistency, and improve the overall performance of a business process. FACILEX® users can leverage this approach to eliminate the need for costly and fragile platform integrations.

What is a DataMart?

A DataMart is a subset of a data warehouse that is focused on a specific business area, function, or department. It is designed to provide users with easy access to relevant data for analysis and reporting without the complexity of integrating with a data warehouse platform.

Key Characteristics of a DataMart:

  • Scope: Limited to a specific subject area (e.g., SOPs, drawings, data books, etc.)
  • Size: Smaller and more focused compared to a data warehouse
  • Audience: Tailored to meet the needs of a specific group of users or a department
  • Independence: Can be stand-alone or part of a larger data warehouse environment

Benefits of a DataMart:

  • Targeted Insights: Provides focused, relevant data for specific business areas
  • Faster Access: Optimized for quick queries and analysis
  • Simplified Complexity: Eliminates the need to navigate a vast data warehouse
  • Cost-Effective: Cheaper to implement and maintain compared to a full-scale data warehouse
  • User-Friendly: Designed with the needs of specific users or departments in mind
  • Scalability: As data volumes grow, the Data Mart can handle increased load efficiently, ensuring smooth data exchange without impacting operational systems.
  • Data Consistency: Standardized data transformations ensure uniformity across integrated platforms, reducing discrepancies.

Implementing a Data Mart in FACILEX®

The FACILEX® CONNECT solution includes the ability to deploy a Data Mart. A Data Mart serves as a structured repository in SharePoint that consolidates, transforms, and optimizes data for seamless sharing between existing platforms such as ERP, EDM (Electronic Document Management), etc.

  1. Data Ingestion: The Data Mart extracts data from multiple sources, including transactional databases, APIs, and external platforms.
  2. Transformation & Standardization: Extracted data undergoes cleansing, validation, and formatting to align with FACILEX® requirements.
  3. Storage & Optimization: Transformed data is stored in optimized structures, ensuring quick access for FACILEX® and other connected systems.
  4. Data Distribution: FACILEX® and other platforms retrieve data from the Data Mart via scheduled syncs, APIs, or direct queries.
  5. Monitoring & Governance: Automated monitoring ensures data integrity, while access controls regulate permissions and security.
Picture of Gateway Group

Gateway Group

Gateway Consulting Group has been a leader in information management solutions for over 30 years, helping businesses navigate complex challenges with a blend of cutting-edge technology and expert consulting. By tailoring solutions to each client's needs, Gateway ensures efficiency, compliance, and streamlined business processes. With decades of experience, Gateway continues to deliver best-in-class strategies that optimize information management, combining innovative tools with a deep understanding of industry requirements.

Share:

More Posts

Workflow Is Not a Strategy: Why Management of Change Must Be Designed as a Lifecycle

Over the past two decades, many organizations have invested heavily in digital Management of Change (MOC) systems. Most of these systems share a common design philosophy: they treat MOC as a workflow—a predefined sequence of steps that moves a change request from initiation to approval and closure.
This approach is appealing to IT teams because workflows are easy to automate, measure, and control. However, it fundamentally misrepresents the nature of Management of Change.
MOC is not a linear process. It is a lifecycle-based business process that must adapt to technical complexity, organizational context, and evolving risk. When organizations attempt to force MOC into rigid workflow structures, they inadvertently create systems that are efficient in appearance but ineffective in practice.
To support modern process safety, MOC must be architected as a configurable lifecycle embedded within an integrated risk-based process safety framework—not as a static workflow engine.

Why Management of Change Must Be Rebuilt for Modern Industry

Management of Change (MOC) is one of the most critical controls in process safety management, yet it remains one of the most misunderstood. While regulatory frameworks such as OSHA 1910.119 define what must be addressed, they do not define how organizations should design, execute, and govern change in complex industrial environments.
Most MOC systems in use today were not designed for the realities of modern operations. They evolved from paper-based processes and early digital document management tools that prioritized compliance over risk intelligence, traceability, and integration.
To meet the demands of contemporary industrial operations, MOC must be fundamentally rethought—not as a form, a workflow, or a compliance exercise, but as a lifecycle-based business process embedded within an integrated process safety ecosystem.

AI Governance Starts Long Before AI Is Introduced

Artificial intelligence governance is often discussed as a new discipline—one that emerges only after AI tools are deployed. Policies are drafted, oversight committees formed, and ethical frameworks debated. While these steps are important, they miss a critical reality:
AI governance does not begin with AI. It begins with how information has been governed for years.

Automation Before AI: Lessons from Asset-Intensive Industries

As artificial intelligence gains momentum across industries, many organizations are eager to move directly from manual work to AI-enabled solutions. In asset-intensive and regulated environments, this leap often ends in frustration. The issue is not ambition, it is sequencing.
Organizations that succeed with AI consistently share one characteristic: they automated their information and business processes before attempting to make them intelligent. Those that skip this step discover that AI struggles to add value on top of fragmented, inconsistent, or poorly defined processes.