Introducing psm.ai the definitive research library for Artificial Intelligence in Process Safety Management

From Metadata to Machine Learning: Deploying an AI Agent for Smarter PSI Search in SharePoint

In our last post, we explored how facility asset structures can transform SharePoint into a smart, context-aware platform for managing Process Safety Information (PSI). But even with a well-organized hierarchy, there's still a bottleneck: finding the exact documents and/or data required for the project. In this post, we’ll walk through a real-world use case of deploying an AI Agent on top of SharePoint to assist in the PSI search and retrieval.
Deploying an AI Agent for Smarter PSI Search in SharePoint

Use Case: Finding the Right PSI for a Pump in the Area 1 Hydrocracker Unit

Let’s say a reliability engineer needs to prepare for a planned maintenance activity on Pump P-1201, one of several pumps in the Area 1 Hydrocracker Unit

To do the job safely and correctly, the engineer needs:

  • The latest maintenance procedure
  • The OEM datasheet
  • Any MOCs or inspection reports related to this specific pump
  • The P&ID showing the pump, associated piping, valves, instrumentation, and upstream/downstream connectivity
  • PHAs (e.g., HAZOP or What-If analyses) discussing risks, failure modes, and safeguards tied to that pump or system

These documents provide essential context for:

  • Confirming isolation points and pressure boundaries
  • Understanding interlocks and control logic
  • Identifying any previous risk scenarios or mitigation actions associated with the equipment
  • Verifying design assumptions when planning MOC or maintenance

Step 1: Structure the Foundation in SharePoint

Before any AI magic happens, the PSI library needs to be:

Populated with current documents
Tagged with metadata: site, area, unit, system, equipment tag, document type, revision, and effective date
Mapped to a facility asset structure (mirroring the CMMS, like SAP or Maximo)

This creates a structured, machine-readable environment.

Step 2: Train the AI Agent with Domain Context

The AI Agent is then trained to understand:

  • Natural language queries and synonyms (e.g., “pump maintenance” = “standard work instruction”)
  • The plant’s unique asset taxonomy
  • Document types and their functional relevance (e.g., datasheets vs. inspection reports)

Training involves ingesting:

  • Sample PSI documents and metadata schemas
  • Tag registries or functional location codes
  • A glossary of site-specific engineering and safety terms

Bonus tip: Pair this with prior PHA/MOC records to teach the agent how certain risks or equipment types are typically discussed.

Step 3: Deploy the AI Agent Inside SharePoint

The AI Agent can be deployed in several ways:

  • As a search assistant embedded in the SharePoint interface
  • Through Microsoft Teams integration (e.g., via Power Virtual Agents)
  • As a standalone web portal that queries SharePoint APIs behind the scenes

Users can now ask questions like:

“What’s the latest inspection summary for P-1201?”
“Are there any active MOCs involving pumps in Area 1?”
“Show me all procedures tied to hydrocracker pumps from the past 6 months.”

The agent parses the request, navigates the facility hierarchy, filters documents by metadata, and delivers ranked, relevant results—along with context snippets and related files.

How the AI Agent Connects the Dots

Because the AI Agent understands metadata and asset relationships, it can surface related PSI across multiple document types. For example:

Query: “What’s the latest PSI for P-1201 in Area 1?”

The AI Agent may return:

  • Maintenance Procedure (Standard Work Instruction)
  • OEM Datasheet
  • P&ID Sheet U1-451A with tag P-1201 highlighted
  • PHA excerpt: HAZOP node for “Hydrocracker Feed Pump P-1201”
  • MOC Package MOC-2023-0095, which includes modifications to pump controls and bypass piping

By aggregating all this information, the agent provides a complete picture, so decisions are made based on engineering, operational, and risk-based perspectives.

Step 4: Validate and Learn from Feedback

To refine results, the AI Agent tracks:

  • Search terms vs. actual documents accessed
  • User feedback on result quality (thumbs up/down, click-through)
  • Patterns in how different roles search (e.g., operators vs. engineers)

This learning loop improves accuracy and builds trust in the system.

Business Value Delivered

By combining SharePoint’s robust document management with an AI Agent’s contextual intelligence, you achieve:

Faster access to the right PSI
Reduced downtime during turnarounds or maintenance
Improved safety through fewer human errors
Higher productivity for technical teams

Final Thought

When process safety is on the line—especially in high-hazard units like hydrocrackers—context is everything. Procedures, datasheets, drawings, risk assessments, and change records are all parts of the same story.The FACILEX® PSM suite utilizes SharePoint for all aspects of electronic document management. Gateway can assist with an AI-PSM project for integrating an AI Agent.

Share:

More Posts

A Real-World Test of Generative AI in Process Safety

Replacement-in-Kind vs. Management of Change

Determining whether a change is Replacement-in-Kind (RIK) or requires Management of Change (MOC) is a critical process safety decision. This post explores whether Generative AI can help make that call more consistently and reliably.

Lessons from the Helium Supply Disruption

Hidden Dependencies in PSM: Lessons from the Helium Supply Disruption

Recent geopolitical instability, including conflict involving Iran, has exposed a structural vulnerability in global helium supply. While helium is often treated as a niche industrial gas, its role in high-hazard operations is disproportionately critical. For many facilities, helium underpins inerting, purging, leak detection, and analytical systems that are foundational to safe operation.
As supply tightens, the issue is not simply cost or availability. It is the introduction of unmanaged process safety risk into systems that were designed with stable helium supply as an implicit assumption.