From Blueprint to Startup: Embedding MOC in the Construction Phase

Management of Change (MOC) is often underutilized or implemented too late during facility construction—an oversight that can compromise process safety and lead to costly delays. In this post, we'll explore why a robust MOC process is crucial during the construction phase of PSM covered facilities. FACILEX® provides a completely integrated solution for MOC.

Constructing a new facility that will use hazardous chemicals is a high stakes undertaking. From concept to commissioning, every decision carries implications for safety, regulatory compliance, schedule, and cost. In the United States, the use of hazardous substances automatically invokes stringent regulatory oversight, including OSHA’s Process Safety Management (PSM) Standard (29 CFR 1910.119). One of the most essential elements of PSM is Management of Change (MOC).

The Purpose of MOC in Construction

MOC is designed to ensure that any modification to a process—whether physical, procedural, or organizational—is evaluated, reviewed, and approved before implementation. While MOC is often associated with operating facilities, it is equally critical during construction, particularly when the design is evolving, procurement decisions are being made, and field adjustments are inevitable.

During construction, changes may include:

  • Substituting equipment or materials due to supply chain delays
  • Altering piping configurations in the field
  • Updating control strategies based on new instrumentation
  • Revising layout for access or egress
  • Changing utility tie-ins or chemical delivery systems

Each of these changes can affect process safety, emergency response planning, or regulatory compliance. An effective MOC process ensures that these impacts are identified and mitigated.

Regulatory Context

If your facility will use hazardous chemicals above threshold quantities, OSHA’s PSM regulation mandates a formal MOC process for changes that affect:

  • Technology
  • Equipment
  • Procedures
  • Personnel responsibilities

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also enforces the Risk Management Program (RMP), which aligns closely with PSM and shares its emphasis on rigorous change management. State and local authorities may have additional permitting or safety requirements tied to MOC outcomes.

Noncompliance, even during the construction phase, can result in:

  • Regulatory citations and fines
  • Project delays
  • Forced redesigns
  • Increased operational risk

MOC as a Risk Management Tool

MOC is not just a compliance exercise—it’s a risk management strategy. During construction, risk profiles can shift quickly. For example:

  • Field routing of chemical transfer lines may create new leak or ignition sources.
  • Equipment substitutions could introduce incompatibilities with corrosive materials.
  • Changes to building structures may block egress or limit ventilation.

Each of these represents a deviation from the original Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) or design basis. By channeling changes through the MOC process, project teams can trigger hazard reviews, design verifications, and stakeholder communication—before changes are physically implemented.

Best Practices for Integrating MOC in Construction

  1. Start Early
    Establish the MOC process before breaking ground. Integrate it with engineering change request workflows and contractor communication plans.
  2. Define Triggers Clearly
    Make it clear what constitutes a “change” and when the MOC process must be invoked. Tie it to deviations from P&IDs, equipment specifications, or safety-critical procedures.
  3. Train Everyone
    Ensure that project engineers, procurement teams, construction managers, and contractors are trained on the MOC process. Empower frontline staff to flag changes that may need evaluation.
  4. Include Multidisciplinary Review
    Each change should be reviewed by representatives from process safety, engineering, operations, and EHS. This ensures a full understanding of the impact.
  5. Tie MOCs to PHA and Pre-Startup Safety Review (PSSR)
    Update hazard analyses and ensure MOC items are closed out before commissioning. Every open MOC represents a potential blind spot.
  6. Use a Centralized Tracking System
    Implement digital tools to track MOC status, approvals, documentation, and closeout. This increases transparency and auditability.

Final Thoughts

Too often, MOC is treated as a post-startup concern—but by then, unsafe or non-compliant decisions may already be built in. A proactive and disciplined MOC process during construction protects workers, ensures regulatory compliance, and reduces costly rework.

If the new facility that will use more than a Threshold Quantity (TQ) of any hazardous chemicals, build MOC into the foundation of your project management practices—not just your process safety program.

Need Support?

If you’re building or expanding a PSM covered facility, Gateway can help you implement a fully integrated MOC solution tailored to your project’s needs. Contact us for information on licensing the FACILEX® PSM suite for your engineering and construction projects.

Share:

More Posts

Leading Utilities Are Embracing Process Safety Management

Municipal water and wastewater utilities are foundational to public health and environmental protection. As these facilities modernize—incorporating new energy systems, automation, and advanced chemical processes—the complexity of operations continues to grow. With this complexity comes a renewed focus on the principles of Process Safety Management (PSM): identifying, assessing, and controlling the risks inherent in high-energy or hazardous systems. By adopting the Management of Change (MOC) process, the municipal sector reflects a culture of professional responsibility to its employees and the community.

Powering the Future Safely: Introducing Process Safety Management to Hydrogen Operations

Hydrogen fuel cells are rapidly transitioning from pilot projects to large-scale deployments in warehouses, logistics hubs, data centers, industrial sites, and beyond. While these systems offer a cleaner, more reliable energy pathway, they also introduce new risks for sectors that have not historically applied process safety practices. Process Safety Management (PSM) provides the framework to manage hydrogen’s unique risks, ensuring operations remain safe, reliable, and scalable.

From Paper to Digital: Transitioning to Electronic Operator Logs in PSM-Covered Facilities

Process Safety Management (PSM) facilities operate in environments where precision, accountability, and real-time visibility are non-negotiable. Among the most critical—but often overlooked—tools for safe operations are operator logs. Traditionally maintained on paper or rudimentary spreadsheets, operator logs are a backbone of shift handovers, deviation tracking, equipment status reporting, and process continuity.

Bridging Legacy HSE Systems with the Latest Process Safety Platforms

Implementing a modern Risk-Based Process Safety (RBPS) platform is rarely a clean break from old systems to new. More often, organizations must operate a mix of legacy applications and newer solutions, each holding essential safety and operational data. This dual environment creates complexity in reporting Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s).
FACILEX® CONNECT delivers holistic KPI dashboards in Power BI without the cost and risk of tight integrations, ensuring continuity and compliance during system transitions.